Source: BBC
In a controversial move, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on January 20, 2025, to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO). This marks the second time Trump has initiated such a withdrawal, citing dissatisfaction with the organization’s handling of global health crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, and concerns over its financial and political structure.
Trump criticized the WHO for being overly influenced by certain member states, particularly China, and for failing to implement necessary reforms. He also argued that the U.S. bore an unfair financial burden, contributing nearly 20% of the WHO’s budget while receiving what he described as insufficient benefits in return.
The withdrawal process will take effect in January 2026, giving time for potential reconsideration or reversal.
Implications of the Withdrawal
The decision has drawn mixed reactions domestically and globally. Supporters of Trump’s move argue that it aligns with his “America First” policy by prioritizing domestic interests and reducing unnecessary financial commitments. Critics, however, warn of significant negative consequences:
Global Health Impact: The U.S., as the WHO’s largest donor, plays a critical role in funding programs to combat diseases like malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS. The withdrawal could disrupt these efforts and weaken global health systems.
U.S. Public Health Risks: Experts caution that leaving the WHO could hinder America’s ability to monitor and respond to international disease outbreaks. The lack of access to global health data and collaboration may leave Americans more vulnerable to pandemics.
Geopolitical Ramifications: The exit may diminish U.S. influence in global health governance while creating opportunities for other nations, such as China and Russia, to expand their roles in shaping international health policies.
A Divisive Decision
While Trump’s administration views this as a step toward reforming international institutions perceived as inefficient or biased, public health experts and international leaders have expressed deep concern. The WHO stated its disappointment but reiterated its willingness to work with the U.S. should it reconsider its stance.
As the world faces increasing health challenges, Trump’s decision underscores a broader debate about the balance between national sovereignty and global cooperation in addressing shared crises.
Whether this move will lead to meaningful reform or exacerbate global health vulnerabilities remains uncertain.
© Noble Nigeria. All Rights Reserved || Privacy Policy and User Agreement